In July 2020, Microsoft was the second company after Apple to surpass 1,500 billion in valuation, 1,546 billion to be precise. And that's just the beginning! 10 years earlier, under its former CEO Steve Ballmer, its valuation was estimated at (only?) 215 billion, and Microsoft was struggling to keep up with the pace of digital transformation, launching itself without much success in the smartphone and SaaS software markets.
Through a textbook case of corporate transformation, it's interesting to see how its new CEO Satya Nadella managed to change the culture of a company with 130,000 employees, but also, and above all, what lessons the leaders of each company can learn from it on their own scale.
When he took the helm at Microsoft in 2014, Satya Nadella's observation was of a dispersed company of engineers, with an internal culture of competition, and closed in on itself...
Here are just a few examples of the customs observed within the teams:
On the whole, Microsoft employees operated in an individualistic way, with few internal synergies and a certain aversion to risk.
In just a few months' work, here is Microsoft's new state of mind, summarized in a list of 3 guidelines drawn up by Satya Nadella:
This change of mindset embodied by the Microsoft leader is based on Carole S. Dweck's theory of the fixed mindset versus the growth mindset. Dweck, which contrasts the fixed mindset with the growth mindset. To caricature, this radical change was originally due to the fact that Steve Ballmer believed in the Fixed Mindset, while Satya Nadella believed in the Growth Mindset.
Take the test Are you a Fixed or Growth Mindset person?
It remains to be seen how, in concrete terms, Satya Nadella has succeeded in bringing about this cultural change and making it permanent.
The cultural factor is the heart of corporate transformation. At Microsoft, the Growth Mindset theory was used to translate the values espoused by Nadella: recognition of individual potential and continuous improvement efforts.
Microsoft's cultural transformation itself then went through 3 key stages to accompany the change:
A few months after taking up his post, Microsoft's CEO came close to disaster during a public speaking engagement on the controversial subject of gender equality. Let's take a look at why, in the end, he proved exemplary in embodying the company's values, and emerged from the event having strengthened his leadership.
Background: In October 2014, Satya Nadella attended a convention promoting women in tech (Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing in Arizona). Microsoft board member Maria Klawe asks him for advice for women who aren't comfortable asking for a raise.
And then the drama begins! Satya Nadella replies: "The problem isn't so much asking for the raise, you have to have confidence in the system's ability to give you the right salary" . The controversy started on social networks. He is accused of being passive on the subject of gender inequality.
Nadella's reaction: an e-mail sent the same day to all Microsoft employees.
Takeaway: More than the initial situation, it was Satya Nadella's reaction that made him a leader who embodies his cultural principles:
While the embodiment of cultural principles in the CEO's leadership is a good first step in anchoring Microsoft's new culture, when you're at the head of a company, that's not enough. You also need to provide your teams with the right operational levers to bring these principles to life on a daily basis.
Microsoft's priority was to define the right performance criteria, i.e. those that would reflect the company's values. And this began with the transformation of the employee appraisal system to a new, impact-based foundation:
We have analyzed the changes brought about by this new reading grid developed by Satya Nadella and the Microsoft management team:
In order to anticipate and address possible resistance, and to stay as close as possible to the teams, Microsoft also set up a "culture commission" headed by Chief People Officer Kathleen Hogan. The annual survey is replaced by weekly consultations on specific subjects, with simple questions to guide the agenda. Here are just a few of the topics on which Microsoft's culture committee has intervened:
You can't manage change in a company without involving employees in the process. This means constantly surveying teams to remove any obstacles to change, and ensuring that employees buy into the transformation project.
To change the organization at all levels of the hierarchy, a new managerial model is taking shape after extensive consultation with Microsoft employees.
This model places managers at the heart of the company's culture, and its long-term survival depends above all on its human capital:
Managing culture change at a company as established as Microsoft was a major challenge. If your context isn't quite the same as Nadella's when he arrived, you may find some of the practices adopted to bring about change useful, and among them :
In July 2020, Microsoft was the second company after Apple to surpass 1,500 billion in valuation, 1,546 billion to be precise. And that's just the beginning! 10 years earlier, under its former CEO Steve Ballmer, its valuation was estimated at (only?) 215 billion, and Microsoft was struggling to keep up with the pace of digital transformation, launching itself without much success in the smartphone and SaaS software markets.
Through a textbook case of corporate transformation, it's interesting to see how its new CEO Satya Nadella managed to change the culture of a company with 130,000 employees, but also, and above all, what lessons the leaders of each company can learn from it on their own scale.
When he took the helm at Microsoft in 2014, Satya Nadella's observation was of a dispersed company of engineers, with an internal culture of competition, and closed in on itself...
Here are just a few examples of the customs observed within the teams:
On the whole, Microsoft employees operated in an individualistic way, with few internal synergies and a certain aversion to risk.
In just a few months' work, here is Microsoft's new state of mind, summarized in a list of 3 guidelines drawn up by Satya Nadella:
This change of mindset embodied by the Microsoft leader is based on Carole S. Dweck's theory of the fixed mindset versus the growth mindset. Dweck, which contrasts the fixed mindset with the growth mindset. To caricature, this radical change was originally due to the fact that Steve Ballmer believed in the Fixed Mindset, while Satya Nadella believed in the Growth Mindset.
Take the test Are you a Fixed or Growth Mindset person?
It remains to be seen how, in concrete terms, Satya Nadella has succeeded in bringing about this cultural change and making it permanent.
The cultural factor is the heart of corporate transformation. At Microsoft, the Growth Mindset theory was used to translate the values espoused by Nadella: recognition of individual potential and continuous improvement efforts.
Microsoft's cultural transformation itself then went through 3 key stages to accompany the change:
A few months after taking up his post, Microsoft's CEO came close to disaster during a public speaking engagement on the controversial subject of gender equality. Let's take a look at why, in the end, he proved exemplary in embodying the company's values, and emerged from the event having strengthened his leadership.
Background: In October 2014, Satya Nadella attended a convention promoting women in tech (Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing in Arizona). Microsoft board member Maria Klawe asks him for advice for women who aren't comfortable asking for a raise.
And then the drama begins! Satya Nadella replies: "The problem isn't so much asking for the raise, you have to have confidence in the system's ability to give you the right salary" . The controversy started on social networks. He is accused of being passive on the subject of gender inequality.
Nadella's reaction: an e-mail sent the same day to all Microsoft employees.
Takeaway: More than the initial situation, it was Satya Nadella's reaction that made him a leader who embodies his cultural principles:
While the embodiment of cultural principles in the CEO's leadership is a good first step in anchoring Microsoft's new culture, when you're at the head of a company, that's not enough. You also need to provide your teams with the right operational levers to bring these principles to life on a daily basis.
Microsoft's priority was to define the right performance criteria, i.e. those that would reflect the company's values. And this began with the transformation of the employee appraisal system to a new, impact-based foundation:
We have analyzed the changes brought about by this new reading grid developed by Satya Nadella and the Microsoft management team:
In order to anticipate and address possible resistance, and to stay as close as possible to the teams, Microsoft also set up a "culture commission" headed by Chief People Officer Kathleen Hogan. The annual survey is replaced by weekly consultations on specific subjects, with simple questions to guide the agenda. Here are just a few of the topics on which Microsoft's culture committee has intervened:
You can't manage change in a company without involving employees in the process. This means constantly surveying teams to remove any obstacles to change, and ensuring that employees buy into the transformation project.
To change the organization at all levels of the hierarchy, a new managerial model is taking shape after extensive consultation with Microsoft employees.
This model places managers at the heart of the company's culture, and its long-term survival depends above all on its human capital:
Managing culture change at a company as established as Microsoft was a major challenge. If your context isn't quite the same as Nadella's when he arrived, you may find some of the practices adopted to bring about change useful, and among them :